Journal article
Comparative effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and interferon beta formulations in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
T Kalincik, V Jokubaitis, G Izquierdo, P Duquette, M Girard, P Grammond, A Lugaresi, C Oreja-Guevara, R Bergamaschi, R Hupperts, F Grandmaison, E Pucci, V Van Pesch, C Boz, G Iuliano, R Fernandez-Bolanos, S Flechter, D Spitaleri, E Cristiano, F Verheul Show all
Multiple Sclerosis | SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD | Published : 2015
Abstract
Background: The results of head-to-head comparisons of injectable immunomodulators (interferon β, glatiramer acetate) have been inconclusive and a comprehensive analysis of their effectiveness is needed. Objective: We aimed to compare, in a real-world setting, relapse and disability outcomes among patientswith multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with injectable immunomodulators. Methods: Pairwise analysis of the international MSBase registry data was conducted using propensityscore matching. The four injectable immunomodulators were compared in six head-to-head analyses of relapse and disability outcomes using paired mixed models or frailty proportional hazards models adjusted for magnetic reson..
View full abstractRelated Projects (5)
Grants
Awarded by Novartis
Funding Acknowledgements
The work was supported by the Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia Postdoctoral Fellowship [11-054] and NHMRC Early Career Award (Clinical) to TK [1071124], NHMRC Career Development Award (Clinical) to HB [628856], NHMRC Project Grant [1032484], NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence [1001216] and the MSBase Foundation. The MSBase Foundation is a not-for-profit organization that receives support from Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, Novartis Pharma, Bayer Schering, Sanofi-Aventis and BioCSL. The study was conducted separately and apart from the guidance of the sponsors. TK had full access to all the data and takes responsibility for integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis.